Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Reply to previous Post



Reply


Hello Mr.Godfrey, there is a distinction between God's divine Moses Law and the Jewish Law, and Tradition. I'm glad you pointed that out, because that makes a difference in dismissing the supposition that because Mary was a woman she could not touch Jesus. The Law of Moses does supersedes the Jewish Law and Traditions. The Law of Moses deals with the soul, and the Jewish Laws and Traditions deals the external of moral ethics and rites.

The offering of first fruits brings clarity of why Mary could not touch Jesus. The wave offering Jesus fulfilled had to be complete order for us to be accepted. This makes sense for Mary not to touch Him at that given time, and answers why Thomas could in the upper room.
Much information has been given here about the divine order, and set time that God ordained for everything to be complete. You noted the Scriptures of John 20:30-31, and Leviticus 23:1-21, that makes references to the prophetic fulfillment of Jesus being our Wave Offering, and Passover Lamb. The Feast of Trumpets is yet to come as you pointed out from Leviticus 23:22-24, and the Book of Revelation.
Thank you so much for this divine insight into the Scriptures.
Glory to God, He's presence is here to give understanding. I thank Him.
God bless all of you.

John 20:11-31 Mary's encounter with Jesus vs. the Disciples



Can someone expound upon why Jesus told Mary not to touch Him because He have not yet ascended to the Father? John 20:17. But in a few verses over He told Thomas to touch His hand and side. (vs. 27). In contrast of Jesus telling Mary not to touch Him before He was ascended into heaven, Jesus allowed Thomas to touch Him by putting his finger in His hand, and His side. John 20: Are there some significant details between the two that we should understand?
Excellent question Linda. Interesting suppositions; Jesus did not come to fulfill Jewish Law or Tradition. He came to fulfill Divine Law as given by Moses; particularly the laws of sacrifice and more specifically the Passover. He was and is our Passover Lamb—the Lamb of God. This is the reason the Temple was destroyed in 70A.D. that no more sacrifices could be made. And they still cannot be made because of the Dome of the Rock sitting in its place, preventing Jewish sacrifices. Not only did Jesus fulfill the Passover sacrifice but all OT sacrifices and offerings. It was God’s own Lamb offered and received for the sins of all humanity as an eternal substitute for you and me so we, as believers in His death, burial, and resurrection (1Cor.15:1-58). Included in those offerings is the wave offering; Leviticus 23:9 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 10 “Speak to the sons of Israel and say to them, ‘When you enter the land which I am going to give to you and reap its harvest, then you shall bring in the sheaf of the first fruits of your harvest to the priest. 11 He shall wave the sheaf before the Lord for you to be accepted; on the day after the Sabbath the priest shall wave it. NASB. So Jesus was also the wave offering, meaning He was the offering of Firstfruit before the Lord God.  Thus He could not be touched by Mary. Sometime later, in the upper room, after He had been waved before the Lord God, [sometime between His encounter with Mary and the upper room encounter with the disciples He became our wave offering] He encountered the disciples in the upper room giving Thomas permission to touch, no actually inspect the now risen from the dead Living Sacrifice. Everything Jesus did was in exact accord with Divine Law in exact timing, on the exact day and hour as the Divine Law required. A survey of events in the life of Jesus reveal  the important timelines to set them in Divine order according to Divine Law. John 20:30-31states the signs given in the presence of the disciples that we might believe. Lev. 23:1-21 are the Feasts already fulfilled by Christ, vs. 22-44 are the Feasts yet to be fulfilled in Revelation. There is an intense difference between Jewish Law and Tradition and Divine Law.


Friday, July 12, 2013

Abraham's Saga part 3




Read: Genesis 14:1-24; Hebrews 7:1-28
Lot and his family is taken captive during the war between the kings and a servant gets free and warns Abram who in turn arms 318 of his servants to pursue the kings, overtake and defeat them setting Lot and family free.
What is so amazing is that Abram had only 318 trained men to slaughter an innumerable host of trained warriors of 4 kings. Not only that but Abram divided them at night (v15) and slaughtered them. This is a tribute to God’s awesome power to a righteous man. Surely, if God could do it for Abram, surely He could do it for you and me. It doesn’t take a large army to defeat your enemies when the Lord God is on your side.
Vs.18-24 records an interesting encounter with another king called Melchizedek, king of Salem. It’s interesting for a number of reasons:
1.    Neither the name of Melchizedek nor Salem, his domain, are mentioned in the lists of the 9 kings who fought against each other.
2.    Melchizedek was also the priest of the most high God. [under Moses law a king could not also be a priest]
3.    Melchizedek brought bread and wine (a pre-incarnate picture of Christ)
4.    Melchizedek blessed Abram admonishing Abram it was the most high God who delivered his enemies into his hands.
5.    Abram paid tithes to Melchizedek of all the spoils taken.
6.    If God be for you, who can be against you? Rm.8:28-31.
Who is Melchizedek?
From the immediate text we are told three things about Melchizedek:
1.    He was the king of Salem [Salem means peace]
2.    He was the priest of the most high God
3.    He received Abram’s tithes
Hebrews 7:1-28 tells us more about this mysterious person.
Vs. 3 reveals an even more intriguing perspective:
·         He was without father or mother
·         Without descent [Melchizedek had/has not ancestry, recorded or otherwise.
·         He had no beginning of days or end of life (no history of birth or death)
·         He was made like unto the Son of God (the pre-incarnate Christ)
·         His priesthood was eternal [different from the Levitical priesthood which changed vs.5
·         He also received tithes from Abraham vs.9
·         The priesthood was changed from Levi to Melchizedek and was to be the  priesthood Jesus Christ was come from vs.12-22
·         Melchizedek’s priesthood did not come from the tribe of Levi, which was authorized to attend the altar vs.11-12, but from a tribe not assigned to altar duties, the tribe of Judah. Vs.14.
·         The priesthood of Jesus Christ will never change; it is eternal; it is not after the works of the law, but of faith. vs.21
Although some scholars would water down the facts to assert that Melchizedek was a mere man and not a deity or, more accurately a visible manifestation of the pre-incarnate Christ. Sometimes in favor of personal opinion we miss the evidence of the reality of Scripture.
Faith Building Practice and Review
1.    List 6 important facts about Melchizedek.
2.    From what tribe was the priesthood ordered?
3.    From what tribe was Christ?
4.    What vital difference is there between the Levitical priesthood and Christ’s?
5.    Was not Melchizedek a manifestation of the pre-incarnate Christ? Explain.
6.    Was not Melchizedek a type of Christ? Explain.
7.    Where would we be today if the priesthood were still of Levi and not Judah?
8.    Do you see God’s love for us in changing the priesthood?
9.    What about His mercy? Graciousness? Kindness? Goodness? Compassion?
10. What is significant about Melchizedek receiving tithes from Abram?



Knowing God
A brief [not complete, add to the list] synopsis of the persona of God:
·         Love
·         Gracious
·         Merciful
·         Righteous
·         Longsuffering
·         Gentle
·         Faithful
·         Compassionate
·         Forgiving
·         Friend
       The ultimate goal of Bible study is to know God and not to merely memorize Bible trivia. As you study, identify the attributes of God. For instance: make a note when you read of God extending His forgiveness or compassion, and remember how He has done the same for you.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Calling to Convince or Live the Faith



Is it our calling as Christians to convince people of our faith or simply just to live out as witnesses?
Natasha, thanks for your most pertinent question. I too have witnessed those who've tried to cram a Thompson Chain Reference down everyone's throat in a desperate but futile attempt to "convert" them. We must remember that even Jesus did not save everyone who heard Him. Nor are we to expect to do so. We as servants are not above our Master. Agrippa, when confronted by Paul stated: "Almost thou hast persuaded me to be a Christian". Acts 26:28 What if you or I were a mute? How then would we "convince" a person to become a Christian, especially if we lived like the devil in their presence and produced no fruit of our salvation? I enjoy the discussion and agree with what I'm reading. Both living the walk and talking the talk are vital. Why should one desire to change if what they are witnessing is worse than that which they already have? Moreover, we are called to be sowers of the Word, spreading it wherever we find ground. The parable of the sower suggest 3 types of ground. Naturally a farmer would not waste good seed on bad ground, but we are not called to be soil inspectors, only sowers of the Word; thus leaving the soil inspection to the Spirit as well as the production and growth of the fruit. Notwithstanding, the sower has a high calling which must not be taken lightly. Discipleship plays a vital part as well. Many an undisciplined, well meaning person has wreaked havoc with the unsuspecting souls of many. However, it is still up to the Spirit to "convince" then to change and convert. "No man comes to the me, except the Father draw him". Jn.6:44 As for "compelling" you and I are to produce "compelling" reasons, both in Word and fleshing or living the walk, but still it is the Spirit which convicts, convinces and saves. As I ponder everyone's thoughts, one thought comes to me; semantics. We are all saying the same thing using different words and thoughts.
Blessings to all.
Richard